Monday, June 7, 2010

Last Blog. Banksy.


Banksy's work: graffiti or murals?

I would defiantly consider Banksy's street art more murals than graffiti even though he is considered a 'graffiti artist'. There is a difference between someone making art and someone hitting up for 'fame'. Bansky does a mixture of both stencils and 'tagging' for his pieces. He seems to find perfect spots which are appropriate for his scene he has created. He even has his own website showcasing his stencils and works he has done around cities of the world. He concentrates on politics, culture, and ethics. Banksy has been born out of the Bristol underground scene which involved collaborations between artists and musicians from the early 1990's until now. His pieces are humorous and I especially like how a lot of them look directly at you even though they are 2D figures on a flat wall.

Bansky does not sell photos of his work. It has been attempted to sell his
street art by art auctioners, on the location they were done. Removing it has proved difficult. Banksy himself, is as underground as his works.
Bansky comments on his technique "I use whatever it takes. Sometimes that just means drawing a moustache on a girl's face on some billboard, sometimes that means sweating for days ov
er an intricate drawing. Efficiency is the key". However not everyone is intrigued with Banksy's work, Tower Hamlets Council in London has decided to treat all Banksy works as vandalism and remove them.

No one knows too much about him, he is guessed to be born in 1974, and believed to come from Yate, South Gloucestershire, near Bristol (where the underground took place). His re
al name is thought to be Robin Banks. One man, Simon Hattenstone, described him as "a 28 year old male who showed up wearing jeans and a t-shirt with a silver tooth, silver chain, and one silver earring". My opinion is that Bansky loves to cause controversy and he enjoys the spectulation that goes on about him. He commented on his website "I am unable to comment on who may or may not be Banksy, but anyone described as being 'good at drawing' doesn't sound like Banksy to me" - a statement which would cause a lot of dispute in itself.

Over the years Banksy has done many pieces. Some people describe them as art, others as vanderlism.
This photo is of a bunch of portaloos which Bansky placed in a field that has the 'sacred circle'. They were placed in the field intentionally for people to interact with and play with. Ironically they were vandalized before the festival they were intended for even started.


I thought this work a pretty funny. I like how Banksy has painted on the window and the idea of being caught in action is both humorous and testing the boundaries with people loving or hating the idea. The spot is perfect, it would defiantly catch an eye when walking past and get a bit of laugh from a lot of people.



I chose this work because i loved the idea of a stencil (considered vandalism by some) is cleaning up graffiti, more vandalism. The whole idea is ironic, and can cause a lot a controversy due to its daring idea. I think the stencil was very well done, right down to the detail or the rolls of wallpaper. I think it turned an everyday space into something interesting and original.


4 comments:

  1. I agree with your opinion here. Whether or not Bansky's work and methods (e.g using public building walls) should be accepted in society is an arguable matter. In some cases it can be seen as "tagging" or merely vandalism. Personally i lean more towards Bansky (which is his pseudonymous)being a "graffiti artist", not a tagger as such, but someone who makes public artworks, not only are they pleasing for the human eye but are entertaining and witty. I also find that last chosen piece amusing. Judging by the fact that people do find his work a nuisance to be cleaned away, it is ironic to see his 'vandalism' cleaning other 'vandalism'.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Personally, I would say banksys work is more graffiti rather than muralistic, simply because graffiti is non conformist and out of the norm which is exactly what banksy is all about, whereas a muralist works within the boundaries and is told what to do and follows the rules. The works you have displayed are very good examples of banksy due to the fact that each one speaks or it has a deep meaning or it makes the viewer think, this is what he sets out to achieve with creating each piece.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Personally I love Banksy's artwork and I agree with what you have written. I really like the point you have written about 'there being a difference between someone making art and someone hitting up for fame'. I think this is very true as Banksy's work is very entertaining and very admired by people who view who is artwork on the streets. I absolutley love the final image you have posted. I think this clearly shows the difference in whether Banksy's work is graffiti or murals. The image of a caretaker painting out the graffiti underneath is a positive effect and once again leans further away from graffiti and further towards murals.

    ReplyDelete
  4. sorry but i disagree with your your first statement saying Banksy is a mural artist rather than a graffiti artist. Normally people get consent before they paint a mural and the theme is often p.c and it appeals to every one, they are normally also just painted with a brush. Graffiti how ever has always been rebellious and the artist have hidden in the shadows because it is a crime. Even though i like Banksys work and find it very interesting he is leaving his mark and without consent on public property. I like how he has hidden his identity because it shows how he is not greedy for fame and does not want to become wealthy of his views. His broad variety of his works and hidden identity allow people to have their own views on his work and it acts as the societies freedom of speech. I like how banksy pokes fun at authorities and i find it hilarious.

    ReplyDelete